[block id=”blogads”]
There was a show, “Anna Kendrick Road Trip with Sex Dolls in Trailer,” which introduced a director named Anna Kendrick. The story is about a protagonist who has a sex doll as a friend. After a therapist tells Anna Kendrick she needs to hug a sex doll to heal herself, she and her new friend embark on a journey filled with bonding, dancing, rest and personal breakthroughs. The show said there is a growing preference for real images to accompany love dolls made of silicone and TPE materials. We call them sex dolls because they are clearly created in an ideal image.
Now, this is just the latest trend in a string of weird new marriages that many have become. For example, the editor once introduced a young Japanese man who was married to the sex robot idol “Hatsune Miku”; and Sergi Santos, a Spanish artificial intelligence expert, who married a robot he designed; and a young Korean who married an Indian Pillows with anime characters.
Feminist sex dolls with feelings seem to be a growing trend. In recent years, we have a company specializing in the production of such sentient feminist sex dolls, which have begun to enter the domestic and international horizons, such as ESDOLL, WMDOLL, DSDOLL, etc. There are also foreign brands famous for the BBC documentary “Man and Doll”, REALDOLS, SITHETICS et al.
These trends have been dubbed by some as “humanoid fascination” or “technocratic lust.” According to the encyclopedia, the obsession is based on the appeal of humanoid dolls or dolls dressed up as adults. We can advertise on the internet and see this anthropomorphic image in some popular anime series and music videos.
But what does it mean when most people describe this fetish from a male perspective? Why are women so often portrayed as robots? What does this tell us about our culture, gender and orientation? Finally, how will human behavior change as a result of these technological advancements?
This is despite claims that humans respond to sex dolls as instinctive responses to abnormal, idealized, and bizarre objects, just as insects respond to various heat and light sources. I believe that fetishes may stem from a person’s desire for control and passivity toward a partner, although not everyone does, as many feel lonely or tired of finding a partner.
But it seems men are the main consumers of sentient feminist sex dolls. What does this tell us about gender, power and culture? It can be argued that this overwhelming prejudice stems from male power, or that males, tired of female exclusion, turned to sex dolls. Some conclusions can be drawn by watching some interviews with sex doll owners in the BBC documentary.
The men in the film, ranging from the lonesome and the abandoned lover, seem to have psychological problems due to alienation, unable to fulfill the expectations of the other half of society. Several of them had partners when they were young, but then broke up and started shutting themselves off from talking to the opposite sex. Others have a strong desire for control, and they choose femininity dolls that have feelings because they don’t defy themselves.
Finally, one has to regret the possibility of liberation in the Cyborg Manifesto. Instead of thinking that the union of man and machine can free us from all forms of oppression (gender, race, age, etc.), we see sexcentrism in artificial fetishes as short-term and exploitative that reinforces Existing gender oppression, i.e. these trends reinforce the objectification of women, patriarchy and male control.